Film: Brazil (1985 -
Original Cut)
Uh, how many different films did I
just watch, because I swear that there are at least 3 different plots simultaneously
progressing in an interwoven matrix of intentionally created confusion? Okay, now that I have regurgitated that out I
can focus on the objective at hand, and that is the eerily close prediction of
the future that Terry Gilliam has accomplished in this film; granted, many
aspects are over-dramatized but the underlying foundation is quite accurate none the less.
In the film, there is a terrorist
bombing campaign (versus the government) that has been going on for 13 years,
and there doesn’t seem to be any kind of notion that it is close to
resolution. This is something that I
could go on-and-on about with our present situation, with so-called terrorist
organizations located all over the globe with the “intent to harm the United
States.” In this film, it is asked, “How
many terrorists have you met Sam, actual terrorists? (time: 94:54)” -a notion
that seems to be gaining sentiment across our nation today. We are constantly told (by higher authorities…)
to be aware (and scared) of something that the majority of the population
cannot relate to. Since terrorism is
such a small faction type of resistance, how can we attribute large scale fear
to it? But we do, and it has overwhelming affected our entire way of life, example: When was the last time you went through an
airport..? This fear that is instilled
into the general population, by means of governmental influence, is just a means
within itself to control populations that then, in turn, are willing to consistently
give up their own personal freedoms for a false sense of security in
return.
False
sense of security; this brings me to my next point. I found it very intriguing that when a bomb
exploded in the film, most of the people (that were not injured…) just go about
their business like nothing ever happened (time: 22:12). I find that many people do this today; they live
with their heads in the sand, blissfully ignorant of the matters at hand. For instance (very small scale…), when one of
those Sarah McLachlan animal abuse commercials comes on, how many people
actually sit through the commercial and then contribute, and how many people
rush to the remote and switch the channel instantly because they don’t want to
accept (acknowledge..?) the fact that this form of abuse happens regularly, and
quite possibly, right next door to where you live..? Most people change the channel; they would
rather be blissfully ignorant of the facts rather than face them, again voluntarily
living with their heads in the sand.
Lastly,
I would like to address the propaganda's throughout the film that encourage a “better
safe than sorry” type of position. We
can see this quite regularly in our world today. How many billboards have you seen around St. Louis
advocating anonymous tip lines and to be a “Crime-stopper?” They are everywhere in the city and county
alike. Our society is bred to believe
that in order to be “good,” someone must be just, but what happens when the
laws that govern are unjust..?
MTG
No comments:
Post a Comment